<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why No Creamy Layer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/</link>
	<description>Politics &#38; Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:40:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: keshavanand bharati: Web Search Results from Answers.com</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-13675</link>
		<dc:creator>keshavanand bharati: Web Search Results from Answers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-13675</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] 368 of the Constitution does not enable ...rajyasabha.nic.in/rajya/19/94/i5/94I50202.htmRetributions Â» Why No Creamy Layer?This ruling by the Supreme Court is going to be the biggest landmark ruling in  the history of [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/nfs/c03/h03/mnt/56080/domains/retributions.nationalinterest.in/html/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] 368 of the Constitution does not enable &#8230;rajyasabha.nic.in/rajya/19/94/i5/94I50202.htmRetributions Â» Why No Creamy Layer?This ruling by the Supreme Court is going to be the biggest landmark ruling in  the history of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bore Gowda</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-13573</link>
		<dc:creator>Bore Gowda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-13573</guid>
		<description>The Greatest sin done to Hindus is reservation to muslims, christains, then  Are Hindus are orphans.?
Since we are calm goers the so called secular political parties are taking advantage and they want to divide the vote of Hindus, to consolidate the muslims, christine votes they are adopting this kind of illegal steps.
I request Supreme court and other courts to stop this religion based reservation in our Hindu Land.
This secular parties in others words Anti Hindu parties are adopting this.
In Tamilnadu Minister is saying they will go ahead with reservationfor Muslims, christine, it is quite ridiculous, and even Muslimsand Christine are coming under BC Category in tamilnadu.
Then it is quite evident political parties want to kill Hindus slow by slow since Hindus vote share is going to BJP.
Their main motto they do not want BJP to come, there is why they are classifying as communal party for their own reasons, a selfish motive who will be forgetting the ideology of the party.mixes any body so that BJP should not come.
Hence giving reservation to minorities is like slow poison of Hindus, then tomorrow muslim subgroups want seperate quota in quota, then hindus sub caste also started for more quota, then it will exceed 100%.
This is a dangerous move by UPA govt keeping snake on hand.

I request supreme court to stop this religion based reservation.
secondly supreme court should also to stop the caste parties who are superheading in tamilnadu.
In TN more then dozen parties are castebased parties who have started less then two years ago, and each one wants  to come up, hence cut throat competion, lot of loose talks to come up due to competitiion.
Hence supreme court should not allow caste based parties to develope.and it is only dividing india into fool status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Greatest sin done to Hindus is reservation to muslims, christains, then  Are Hindus are orphans.?<br />
Since we are calm goers the so called secular political parties are taking advantage and they want to divide the vote of Hindus, to consolidate the muslims, christine votes they are adopting this kind of illegal steps.<br />
I request Supreme court and other courts to stop this religion based reservation in our Hindu Land.<br />
This secular parties in others words Anti Hindu parties are adopting this.<br />
In Tamilnadu Minister is saying they will go ahead with reservationfor Muslims, christine, it is quite ridiculous, and even Muslimsand Christine are coming under BC Category in tamilnadu.<br />
Then it is quite evident political parties want to kill Hindus slow by slow since Hindus vote share is going to BJP.<br />
Their main motto they do not want BJP to come, there is why they are classifying as communal party for their own reasons, a selfish motive who will be forgetting the ideology of the party.mixes any body so that BJP should not come.<br />
Hence giving reservation to minorities is like slow poison of Hindus, then tomorrow muslim subgroups want seperate quota in quota, then hindus sub caste also started for more quota, then it will exceed 100%.<br />
This is a dangerous move by UPA govt keeping snake on hand.</p>
<p>I request supreme court to stop this religion based reservation.<br />
secondly supreme court should also to stop the caste parties who are superheading in tamilnadu.<br />
In TN more then dozen parties are castebased parties who have started less then two years ago, and each one wants  to come up, hence cut throat competion, lot of loose talks to come up due to competitiion.<br />
Hence supreme court should not allow caste based parties to develope.and it is only dividing india into fool status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muthuraj</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-12360</link>
		<dc:creator>muthuraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-12360</guid>
		<description>I APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT JUDGES AND CHIEF JUSTICS OF INDIA MR.BALAKRISHNAN, AND ALSO JUDGE MR.RAVINDRAN , NOT TO LISTEN POLITICAL PARTIES STAND ON RESERVATION.THESE PEOPLE ARE VOTE SNATCHING POLITICAL PEOPLE WHO ARE SPLITTING HINDU SOCEITY INTO CASTE AND THEY RIDE ON SPLITTING INTO BC, MBC, AND SC.
THIS RESERVATION BENEFICIARRIES ARE ONLY RICHER SEGMENT OF OBC AND POOR SEGMENT OF OBC.
MY PARENTS ARE INTERCASTE PEOPLE MY FATHER IS SC, AND MY MOTHER IS BRAHAMIN.
I FEEL ASHMED OF TREATING BRAHAMINS AS A SLAVERY IN TAMILNADU, AND IN NO STATE THESE KIND OF TREATMENT WILL BE METED OUT, 
THESE ANTI BRAHMINS ARE METED OUT BY DRAVIDAN PARTIES THAT IS DMK,AND DK 60 YEARS BACK, AND RESERVATION IS ALSO IN TN FOR THE LAST 60 YEARS.
IN TN BRAHAMINS ARE REAL SC PEOPLE BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE MOUTH, MUSCLE AND MONEY POWER PEOPLE ARE HARASSING THEM, AND THE MOST OF TAMIL NADU BRAHMINS ARE GONE TO MUMBAI BANGALORE AND TO NORTH INDIAN STATES.
IT IS FINAL MOTIVE OF DRAVIDAN PARTIES ARE DRIVE OUT BRAHMINS AND NORTH INDIAN PEOPLE FROM TAMILNADU,IN THEIR EACH AND EVERY APPRAOCH SHOWS THE WAY, GIVING 70% RESERVATION TO BC,MBC,SC, THEY WANT DRAVIDAN TAMILS TO LIVE IN TN, WHICH IS A DANGEROUS MOVE,I DO NOT KNOW HOW CENTRAL GOVT IS MAKING SILENCE SINCE THEY WANT SURVIVAL OF GOVT OTHERWISE COMMUNAL BJP WILL COME.
IS IT SOCIAL JUSTICS, ?RICH WILL BECOME RICH AND POOR WILL BECOME POOR
IN OBC,MBC RESERVATION SHOULD BE ON INCOME BASIS AND NOT BY CASTE BASIS.
FOR THIS INCOME BASE RESERVATION POLITICAL PARTIES ARE NOT READY TO ACCEPT,
BUT ONE THING, RESERVATION IS A DANGEROUS PATH, 30 YEARS BACK DMK CAME TO POWER ON ANTI NORTH AND ANTI BRAHAMINS AND PRO TAMIL NOW PMK IS SPLITTING TAMILS INTO CASTE LIKE VANNIYAR PARTY, TOMORROW ONE PARTY WILL DIVIDE VANNIYAR INTO SMALL GROUPS, AND THEY WANT RESERVATION, THEN THE RESERVATION WILL GO UPTO 200%
SINCE IN TN LOT OF CASTE PARTIES ARE THERELIKE PMK-VANNIYAR CASTE PARTY, EACH AND EVERY PARTY WANTS RESERVATION FOR THEIR CASTE.
IF THIS SAME GOES INDIA WILL BECOME DOGS BECAUSE OF TAMILNADU SELFISH CASTE PARTY PEOPLE, I APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT NOT TO HEEL THIS POLITICAL PARTIES CRY.
IN TN ANTI HINDU SENTIMENT ARE MORE, SINCE TAMILS ARE BLACK PEOPLE AND NORTH INDIAN PEOPLE ARE WHITE IN COLOR, BECAUSE OF COLOR ONLY RESERVATION STARTED.
IN TN MUSLIMS ARE REGARDED AS TAMILS, SINCE BOTH TAMILS AND MUSLIMS ARE SAME WAVELENGTH, BOTH ARE ANTI HINDU AND VOILENT PEOPLE.
FOOD HABIT ONLY BIFACATE MAN INTO MAN AND ANIMAL.
I DO NOT WANT INDIA TO BE DOGS, OUT COUNTRY WANTS BRIGHTNESS PLEASE DO NOT GIVE RESERVATION TO RICH OBC, PLEASE PUT A CLAUSE ON INCOME BASIS AND PLEASE DO NOT GIVE RELIGION BASED RESERVATION TO MUSLIMS AND CHRISTMAS, THEN HINDUS ARE ORPHANS IN OUT HOME LAND.
PL HUMBLY TAKE MY ADVICE AND SAVE INDIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT JUDGES AND CHIEF JUSTICS OF INDIA MR.BALAKRISHNAN, AND ALSO JUDGE MR.RAVINDRAN , NOT TO LISTEN POLITICAL PARTIES STAND ON RESERVATION.THESE PEOPLE ARE VOTE SNATCHING POLITICAL PEOPLE WHO ARE SPLITTING HINDU SOCEITY INTO CASTE AND THEY RIDE ON SPLITTING INTO BC, MBC, AND SC.<br />
THIS RESERVATION BENEFICIARRIES ARE ONLY RICHER SEGMENT OF OBC AND POOR SEGMENT OF OBC.<br />
MY PARENTS ARE INTERCASTE PEOPLE MY FATHER IS SC, AND MY MOTHER IS BRAHAMIN.<br />
I FEEL ASHMED OF TREATING BRAHAMINS AS A SLAVERY IN TAMILNADU, AND IN NO STATE THESE KIND OF TREATMENT WILL BE METED OUT,<br />
THESE ANTI BRAHMINS ARE METED OUT BY DRAVIDAN PARTIES THAT IS DMK,AND DK 60 YEARS BACK, AND RESERVATION IS ALSO IN TN FOR THE LAST 60 YEARS.<br />
IN TN BRAHAMINS ARE REAL SC PEOPLE BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE MOUTH, MUSCLE AND MONEY POWER PEOPLE ARE HARASSING THEM, AND THE MOST OF TAMIL NADU BRAHMINS ARE GONE TO MUMBAI BANGALORE AND TO NORTH INDIAN STATES.<br />
IT IS FINAL MOTIVE OF DRAVIDAN PARTIES ARE DRIVE OUT BRAHMINS AND NORTH INDIAN PEOPLE FROM TAMILNADU,IN THEIR EACH AND EVERY APPRAOCH SHOWS THE WAY, GIVING 70% RESERVATION TO BC,MBC,SC, THEY WANT DRAVIDAN TAMILS TO LIVE IN TN, WHICH IS A DANGEROUS MOVE,I DO NOT KNOW HOW CENTRAL GOVT IS MAKING SILENCE SINCE THEY WANT SURVIVAL OF GOVT OTHERWISE COMMUNAL BJP WILL COME.<br />
IS IT SOCIAL JUSTICS, ?RICH WILL BECOME RICH AND POOR WILL BECOME POOR<br />
IN OBC,MBC RESERVATION SHOULD BE ON INCOME BASIS AND NOT BY CASTE BASIS.<br />
FOR THIS INCOME BASE RESERVATION POLITICAL PARTIES ARE NOT READY TO ACCEPT,<br />
BUT ONE THING, RESERVATION IS A DANGEROUS PATH, 30 YEARS BACK DMK CAME TO POWER ON ANTI NORTH AND ANTI BRAHAMINS AND PRO TAMIL NOW PMK IS SPLITTING TAMILS INTO CASTE LIKE VANNIYAR PARTY, TOMORROW ONE PARTY WILL DIVIDE VANNIYAR INTO SMALL GROUPS, AND THEY WANT RESERVATION, THEN THE RESERVATION WILL GO UPTO 200%<br />
SINCE IN TN LOT OF CASTE PARTIES ARE THERELIKE PMK-VANNIYAR CASTE PARTY, EACH AND EVERY PARTY WANTS RESERVATION FOR THEIR CASTE.<br />
IF THIS SAME GOES INDIA WILL BECOME DOGS BECAUSE OF TAMILNADU SELFISH CASTE PARTY PEOPLE, I APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT NOT TO HEEL THIS POLITICAL PARTIES CRY.<br />
IN TN ANTI HINDU SENTIMENT ARE MORE, SINCE TAMILS ARE BLACK PEOPLE AND NORTH INDIAN PEOPLE ARE WHITE IN COLOR, BECAUSE OF COLOR ONLY RESERVATION STARTED.<br />
IN TN MUSLIMS ARE REGARDED AS TAMILS, SINCE BOTH TAMILS AND MUSLIMS ARE SAME WAVELENGTH, BOTH ARE ANTI HINDU AND VOILENT PEOPLE.<br />
FOOD HABIT ONLY BIFACATE MAN INTO MAN AND ANIMAL.<br />
I DO NOT WANT INDIA TO BE DOGS, OUT COUNTRY WANTS BRIGHTNESS PLEASE DO NOT GIVE RESERVATION TO RICH OBC, PLEASE PUT A CLAUSE ON INCOME BASIS AND PLEASE DO NOT GIVE RELIGION BASED RESERVATION TO MUSLIMS AND CHRISTMAS, THEN HINDUS ARE ORPHANS IN OUT HOME LAND.<br />
PL HUMBLY TAKE MY ADVICE AND SAVE INDIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kskulkarni</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-12113</link>
		<dc:creator>kskulkarni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-12113</guid>
		<description>I APPEAL TO ALL JUDGES  OF SUPREME COURT AND RESPECTED CHIEF JUSTICS OF INDIA MR.BALAKRISHNAN.
THIS IS A VOICE OF COMMON MAN WHO WANT INDIA SHOULD BE BRIGHTER IN FUTURE.
OUR POLITICAL PARTIES WANTS 27% RESERVATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION COLLEGES, IT IS MOTIVATED BY DMK,PMK AND DRAVIDAN PARTIES AND NOT CONGRESS.
BUT, ALAS, CONGRESS IS DUMMY, THEY ARE LISTENING ANTI HINDI AND ANTI NORTH PARTY FOR THEIR SURVIVAL.TAMILNADU POLITICIANS ARE ENCASHING THIS SCENARIOS.
IN TN THERE ARE TWO SCENARIOS ONLY ONE IS OBC, SC RESERVATION ANY WHERE EVERYWHERE,AND ANOTHER 
CAUVERY WATER DISPUTE , NORMALLY TN POLITICIANS RIDE ON WEAK PEOPLE ONLY LIKE SO CALLED FORWARD CALASSES, AND ANOTHER IS KANNADIGAS, THESE PEOPLE ARE GOD FEARING TYPE AND THEY WILL STRICT TO DHARMA, NOT LIKE DRAVIDAN TAMILIANS.
IN TN RESERVATION HAS BEEN INJECTED INTO THE BLOODS OF TAMILS BY DRAVIDAN PARTIES, FOR VOTE SHARE, TO KEEP AWAY THE BRAHMIN COMMUNITY.
THIS EXTREME KIND OF RACISAMS THEY ARE HAVING.
GENERALLY TAMILS ARE BLACK IN COMPLEXION, THEY DO NOT LIKE WHITE COMPLEXION PEOPLE LIKE NORTH INDIANS.
NOW COMING BACK TO OUR RESERVATIONOF CENTRAL GOVT PROPOSAL IT WILL NOT YIELD ANY HELP TO POOR OBC, IT WILL GIVE BOOST ONLY TO EDUCATED OBC, AND RICH OBC.
WHEN THEY ARE EDUCATED WHY THEY NEED RESERVATION, THIS IS A RIDICULOUS QUESTION, AND EVERY OBC SHOULD FEEL SHAME FOR THESE SELFISH ATTRITUDE, AND IN THE RECENT SURVEY IN TN WHERE RESERVATION IS MORE THEN 70% , THESE OBC, AND SC PEOPLE ARE OCCUPYING GENERAL CATEGOTY SEATS,AND THEY CORNORED 50% SEATS, THEN WHY RESERVATION NEEDS TO THESE PEOPLE.
THIS IS RIDICULOUS SITUVATION WHERE DOCTORS ARE AGITATING FOR PRO RESERVATION RALLY, THAT MEANS THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT HAVING CONFIDENCE TO LIVE ON THEIR.
HENCE I APPEAL TO JUDGES NOT TO FOLLOW TN MODELS, THESE SCENARIOS ARE DIFFERENT, THAT IS PURELY ANTI BRAHAMIS ATTRITUDE, HENCE OUR SUPREME COURT SHOULD NOT HEED TO THIS 27% RESERVATION TO OBC IN ELITE INSITUTIONS, THAT WILL ONLY GO THE RICHER OBC.EVEN IN OBC THERE SHOULD BE QUOTA TO ALL STATES OTHERWISE TN OBC WILL TAKE THE MAJOR SHARE, SINCE ALL BIG CASTES ARE OBC AT TN.I REQUEST COURT TO ABIDE BY ECONOMICALLY BASIS RESERVATION FOR OBC.
THEN ONLY WE CAN SEE THE REAL SECULARISAMS AND SOCIAL JUSTICS NOT BY ALLOWING RICH OBC TO BE MORE STRONGER.
GIVE OPPURTUNITY TO POOR OBC.
THIS IS OUR HUMBLE VIEW IT IS THE ECOES OF ALL INDIAN PEOPLE AND NOT TN PEOPLE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I APPEAL TO ALL JUDGES  OF SUPREME COURT AND RESPECTED CHIEF JUSTICS OF INDIA MR.BALAKRISHNAN.<br />
THIS IS A VOICE OF COMMON MAN WHO WANT INDIA SHOULD BE BRIGHTER IN FUTURE.<br />
OUR POLITICAL PARTIES WANTS 27% RESERVATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION COLLEGES, IT IS MOTIVATED BY DMK,PMK AND DRAVIDAN PARTIES AND NOT CONGRESS.<br />
BUT, ALAS, CONGRESS IS DUMMY, THEY ARE LISTENING ANTI HINDI AND ANTI NORTH PARTY FOR THEIR SURVIVAL.TAMILNADU POLITICIANS ARE ENCASHING THIS SCENARIOS.<br />
IN TN THERE ARE TWO SCENARIOS ONLY ONE IS OBC, SC RESERVATION ANY WHERE EVERYWHERE,AND ANOTHER<br />
CAUVERY WATER DISPUTE , NORMALLY TN POLITICIANS RIDE ON WEAK PEOPLE ONLY LIKE SO CALLED FORWARD CALASSES, AND ANOTHER IS KANNADIGAS, THESE PEOPLE ARE GOD FEARING TYPE AND THEY WILL STRICT TO DHARMA, NOT LIKE DRAVIDAN TAMILIANS.<br />
IN TN RESERVATION HAS BEEN INJECTED INTO THE BLOODS OF TAMILS BY DRAVIDAN PARTIES, FOR VOTE SHARE, TO KEEP AWAY THE BRAHMIN COMMUNITY.<br />
THIS EXTREME KIND OF RACISAMS THEY ARE HAVING.<br />
GENERALLY TAMILS ARE BLACK IN COMPLEXION, THEY DO NOT LIKE WHITE COMPLEXION PEOPLE LIKE NORTH INDIANS.<br />
NOW COMING BACK TO OUR RESERVATIONOF CENTRAL GOVT PROPOSAL IT WILL NOT YIELD ANY HELP TO POOR OBC, IT WILL GIVE BOOST ONLY TO EDUCATED OBC, AND RICH OBC.<br />
WHEN THEY ARE EDUCATED WHY THEY NEED RESERVATION, THIS IS A RIDICULOUS QUESTION, AND EVERY OBC SHOULD FEEL SHAME FOR THESE SELFISH ATTRITUDE, AND IN THE RECENT SURVEY IN TN WHERE RESERVATION IS MORE THEN 70% , THESE OBC, AND SC PEOPLE ARE OCCUPYING GENERAL CATEGOTY SEATS,AND THEY CORNORED 50% SEATS, THEN WHY RESERVATION NEEDS TO THESE PEOPLE.<br />
THIS IS RIDICULOUS SITUVATION WHERE DOCTORS ARE AGITATING FOR PRO RESERVATION RALLY, THAT MEANS THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT HAVING CONFIDENCE TO LIVE ON THEIR.<br />
HENCE I APPEAL TO JUDGES NOT TO FOLLOW TN MODELS, THESE SCENARIOS ARE DIFFERENT, THAT IS PURELY ANTI BRAHAMIS ATTRITUDE, HENCE OUR SUPREME COURT SHOULD NOT HEED TO THIS 27% RESERVATION TO OBC IN ELITE INSITUTIONS, THAT WILL ONLY GO THE RICHER OBC.EVEN IN OBC THERE SHOULD BE QUOTA TO ALL STATES OTHERWISE TN OBC WILL TAKE THE MAJOR SHARE, SINCE ALL BIG CASTES ARE OBC AT TN.I REQUEST COURT TO ABIDE BY ECONOMICALLY BASIS RESERVATION FOR OBC.<br />
THEN ONLY WE CAN SEE THE REAL SECULARISAMS AND SOCIAL JUSTICS NOT BY ALLOWING RICH OBC TO BE MORE STRONGER.<br />
GIVE OPPURTUNITY TO POOR OBC.<br />
THIS IS OUR HUMBLE VIEW IT IS THE ECOES OF ALL INDIAN PEOPLE AND NOT TN PEOPLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRAKASH</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-11075</link>
		<dc:creator>PRAKASH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 10:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-11075</guid>
		<description>THE REAL BENEFICT OF  OBC RESERVATION GOES TO RICHER SEGMENT OF OBC AND EDUCATED PEOPLE IN OBC,LIKE ENGINEERS AND DOCTORS OF OBC.
HENCE CREMY LAYER SHOULD BE IMPOSED ON ECONOMIC BASIS OF OBC, FOR THIS POLITICAL PARTIES ESPECIALLY FROM TAMILNADU DMK PMK THOSE ARE ALL ANTI HINDU PRO MINORITY PARTIES WILL OPPOSE IT FOR VOTES.
HENCE IMPOSE CREAMY LAYER FOR SECULARISAM, LET ALL POOR PEOPLE LIVE.
WHAT IS SOCIAL JUSTICS,? THIS IS A NEW WORD FOR CASTE BASED POLITICS STARTED BY DMK IN TAMILNADU WHO ARE DIVIDING PEOPLE IN HINDUS LIKE BC,MBC,SC AND OC(OTHER CASTES)THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY OTHER WORK, THEY WILL SIMPLY CRY FOR OBC RESERVATION, THEY ARE NOT BOTHERED ABOUT PRICE RISE. THEY WANT TO PROTEST AGAINST ONLY WITH BRAHAMINS.LIKE RACISAMS AGAINST BLACK IN AUSTRALIA, THIS IS RACISAMS AGAINST WHEAT COMPLEXTION.
NOW THE PLIGHT IS THEY HAVE APPOINTED ALL CASTES INTO PRIEST CLASS, TO WIPE BRAHAMINS FROM TAMILNADU, THIS IS RIDICULOUS MOVEMENT WHICH SHOULD BE CONDEMNED IN ALL OVER INDIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE REAL BENEFICT OF  OBC RESERVATION GOES TO RICHER SEGMENT OF OBC AND EDUCATED PEOPLE IN OBC,LIKE ENGINEERS AND DOCTORS OF OBC.<br />
HENCE CREMY LAYER SHOULD BE IMPOSED ON ECONOMIC BASIS OF OBC, FOR THIS POLITICAL PARTIES ESPECIALLY FROM TAMILNADU DMK PMK THOSE ARE ALL ANTI HINDU PRO MINORITY PARTIES WILL OPPOSE IT FOR VOTES.<br />
HENCE IMPOSE CREAMY LAYER FOR SECULARISAM, LET ALL POOR PEOPLE LIVE.<br />
WHAT IS SOCIAL JUSTICS,? THIS IS A NEW WORD FOR CASTE BASED POLITICS STARTED BY DMK IN TAMILNADU WHO ARE DIVIDING PEOPLE IN HINDUS LIKE BC,MBC,SC AND OC(OTHER CASTES)THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY OTHER WORK, THEY WILL SIMPLY CRY FOR OBC RESERVATION, THEY ARE NOT BOTHERED ABOUT PRICE RISE. THEY WANT TO PROTEST AGAINST ONLY WITH BRAHAMINS.LIKE RACISAMS AGAINST BLACK IN AUSTRALIA, THIS IS RACISAMS AGAINST WHEAT COMPLEXTION.<br />
NOW THE PLIGHT IS THEY HAVE APPOINTED ALL CASTES INTO PRIEST CLASS, TO WIPE BRAHAMINS FROM TAMILNADU, THIS IS RIDICULOUS MOVEMENT WHICH SHOULD BE CONDEMNED IN ALL OVER INDIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep Kumar</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-4195</guid>
		<description>There is the need of aplication of the Quota with the creamy layer also. I have three resion in faver of this 
1) Researvation is based on the Social justice not the economic census.
2) people belonging the OBC are haveing littel Knowlege about there rights there for genral Catagry peoples are discraminate them.
3) there is no develpment in the living standered of the obc&#039;s after freedum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the need of aplication of the Quota with the creamy layer also. I have three resion in faver of this<br />
1) Researvation is based on the Social justice not the economic census.<br />
2) people belonging the OBC are haveing littel Knowlege about there rights there for genral Catagry peoples are discraminate them.<br />
3) there is no develpment in the living standered of the obc&#8217;s after freedum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cognizant</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>cognizant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>RC,

When interviewd on the issue of creamy layer in proposed 27% reservation to the OBCs, the union overseas minister Vayalar Ravi said (refer to:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2088966.cms): 
    &quot;Frankly, the Union law ministry&#039;s opinion (Cabinet Note) was not proper. It was not correct to extend the idea of the creamy layer which flows from the Indra Sawhney case regarding job reservations to quotas in educational institutions. These are separate issues.&quot;

Do you think that these two issues are two separate legal issues? Will the SC&#039;s verdict in the case of Indra Sahney&#039;s case hold good for quotas in educational institues OR will the SC consider &quot;job reservations&quot; and &quot;quotas in educational institutions&quot; as two separate things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RC,</p>
<p>When interviewd on the issue of creamy layer in proposed 27% reservation to the OBCs, the union overseas minister Vayalar Ravi said (refer to:<br />
<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2088966.cms)" rel="nofollow">http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2088966.cms)</a>:<br />
    &#8220;Frankly, the Union law ministry&#8217;s opinion (Cabinet Note) was not proper. It was not correct to extend the idea of the creamy layer which flows from the Indra Sawhney case regarding job reservations to quotas in educational institutions. These are separate issues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you think that these two issues are two separate legal issues? Will the SC&#8217;s verdict in the case of Indra Sahney&#8217;s case hold good for quotas in educational institues OR will the SC consider &#8220;job reservations&#8221; and &#8220;quotas in educational institutions&#8221; as two separate things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polite Indian</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Polite Indian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-188</guid>
		<description>The creamy layer needs to be excluded from the purview of the benefits of reservation  if the purpose of the reservations is to be achieved. 
It sure means more competition if the creamy layer is excluded but that will be in line with the purpose of the reservations and would benefit other OBCs who would not get admitted otherwise.
 I have my views in a post titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://politeindian.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/the-flip-side-of-creamy-layer-2/.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The  Flip Side Of Creamy Layer.&lt;/a&gt;
Assuming that 27% OBCs already get admitted to these institutes and that most of them are from creamy layer, I have tried to show in my post that if the creamy layer is included then the only thing that might happen is a minor readjustment in the existing setup without affecting the total number of seats in the open category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creamy layer needs to be excluded from the purview of the benefits of reservation  if the purpose of the reservations is to be achieved.<br />
It sure means more competition if the creamy layer is excluded but that will be in line with the purpose of the reservations and would benefit other OBCs who would not get admitted otherwise.<br />
 I have my views in a post titled <a href="http://politeindian.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/the-flip-side-of-creamy-layer-2/." rel="nofollow">The  Flip Side Of Creamy Layer.</a><br />
Assuming that 27% OBCs already get admitted to these institutes and that most of them are from creamy layer, I have tried to show in my post that if the creamy layer is included then the only thing that might happen is a minor readjustment in the existing setup without affecting the total number of seats in the open category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oversight Committee website &#171; Reality Check India</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Oversight Committee website &#171; Reality Check India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] Just substituting Urban student A with UrbanÂ student B from the same school, is not going to promote diversity. It is an outright case of reverse discrimination if you treat two students from a similar background differently. This is a clear cut case of unequal treatment of equals.Â See a related post by confused here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just substituting Urban student A with UrbanÂ student B from the same school, is not going to promote diversity. It is an outright case of reverse discrimination if you treat two students from a similar background differently. This is a clear cut case of unequal treatment of equals.Â See a related post by confused here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc</title>
		<link>http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/why-no-creamy-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>rc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributions.nationalinterest.in/?p=280#comment-186</guid>
		<description>It is depressing that the politicians would approve a bill on the house that openly flies in the face of established precedents. Now, the SC has to step in and take up the unpleasant task of cleaning up the mess left behind. Either that or everyone throws the constitution aside - and decide to run the country on goonda power.

Thanks to the amazing foresight of a great man called Nani Palkhivala, the constition cannot be amended at will. Any amendment that goes against the so called basic structure will be declared void. If the cap is raised higher than 50%, quotas will no longer be the exception - it will become the rule and equality will be the exception. Ambedkar himself declared that &quot;Under no circumstances, can the exception be allowed to swallow the rule&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is depressing that the politicians would approve a bill on the house that openly flies in the face of established precedents. Now, the SC has to step in and take up the unpleasant task of cleaning up the mess left behind. Either that or everyone throws the constitution aside &#8211; and decide to run the country on goonda power.</p>
<p>Thanks to the amazing foresight of a great man called Nani Palkhivala, the constition cannot be amended at will. Any amendment that goes against the so called basic structure will be declared void. If the cap is raised higher than 50%, quotas will no longer be the exception &#8211; it will become the rule and equality will be the exception. Ambedkar himself declared that &#8220;Under no circumstances, can the exception be allowed to swallow the rule&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
